The Right to be Forgotten as the Frontier of Justice: An Analysis of the Role of Judges in Realising Digital Justice
Downloads
The presence of right to be forgotten is an essential starting point for protecting human dignity through the deletion, restrictions, or changing past records on internet. However, there are many challenges in the implementation of it which presents new limitations to the renewal of justice (frontier of justice). This study is going to answer how right to be forgotten is the frontier of justice and what is the role of judges in implementing right to be forgotten in order to realize digital justice. The urgency is to determine the role of judges in adapting to legal developments, such as determining the limits of justice for the existence of right to be forgotten. The method used is normative juridical with a literature review that will be concluded deductively. This study indicate that right to be forgotten is included in the frontier of justice because this right brings new boundaries in the process of seeking justice. These boundaries of justice arise because there is a clash in efforts to implement right to be forgotten with the implementation of other rights. Thus, judges through their decisions become the main pillar for implementing right to be forgotten. The role of judges is very crucial in maintaining human rights so that they are always balanced and do not cause conflict with other rights.
Aderonke Abimbola Ojo. (2021). An Appraisal of Literature Review and Theoretical Framework in Legal Research. International Journal of Law, 7 (5), 128–133. https://www.lawjournals.org/assets/archives/2021/vol7issue5/7-5-38-691.pdf.
Ahmad M. Ramli, Tasya Safiranita, Denindah Olivia, & Reihan Ahmad Millaudy. (2022). Legal Aspect Of The Right To Be Forgotten (RTF) On Social Media In Indonesia. Technology and Economics Law Journal, 1 (2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.21143/TELJ.vol1.no2.1008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21143/TELJ.vol1.no2.1008
Aliya Ilysia Irfana Ampri & Muhammad Deckri Algamar. (2022). Hak untuk Dilupakan Penghapusan Jejak Digital sebagai Perlindungan Selebriti Anak dari Bahaya Deepfake. Jurnal Yustika, 25 (1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v25i01.5091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v25i01.5091
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (7-2-2024). APJII Jumlah Pengguna Internet Indonesia Tembus 221 Juta Orang. “Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia”. https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang, diakses pada tanggal 2 Februari 2025.
Chesaria Anggun Permaningtyas, Putri Shania Azizah Dinnar, Ridlo Ifran Addiasar, & Shelma Fatika Candra Kusumaningsih. (2024). Urgensi Pemenuhan Kesejahteraan Hakim sebagai Upaya menegakkan Integritas. Judex Laguens, 2 (3), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.3.12.2024.335-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.3.12.2024.335-356
Faiqah Nur Azizah, Athari Farhani, & Nur Kholifah. (2024). Urgensitas Penguatan Etika Profesi Hakim sebagai Dasar Pondasi Hukum. Judex Laguens, 2 (1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.55-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.55-74
Holili, M. Yunus, & Winarto. (2024). Kedudukan Yurisprudensi sebagai Sumber Hukum di Indonesia Terhadap Penganut Sistem Civil Law. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3 (9), 3718–3726. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i09.1140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v3i09.1140
I Wayan Sudira. (2024). Keadilan Digital: Tantangan Hukum dalam Era Disrupsi Teknologi. Kertha Widya Jurnal Hukum, 12 (1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.37637/kw.v12i2.220.
Karunia Fitri Rahmadani & M. Darin Arif Mu’allifin. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Pengaturan Hak untuk Dilupakan (right to be Forgotten) dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan, 3 (1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2023.3.1.18-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2023.3.1.18-41
Leli Tibaka & Rosdian. (2017). The Protection of Human Rights in Indonesian Constitutional Law after the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Fiat Justicia, 11 (3), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v11no3.1141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v11no3.1141
Louise Proud. (1-7-2021). Book review of Frontiers of Justice. “Crip HumAnimal”. https://criphumanimal.org/2020/07/01/book-review-frontiers-of-justice-guest-post-louise-proud/, diakses pada 8 Februari 2025.
Maria Giulia Bernerdini. (2024). Old Age as A “New Frontier” of (Spatial) Justice. The Age of Human Rights Journal, 23, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v23.8997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v23.8997
Michael J. Kelly & David Satola. (2017). The Right to be Forgotten. University of Illinois Law Review, 1, 1-64. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2965685.
Ni Kadek Dhea Ardi Prabasari, Kadek Januarsa Adi Sudharma, & Michael Angelo. (2024). The Right to be Forgotten: Regulation of Personal Data Deletion in Indonesia. Krtha Bhayangkara, 18 (3), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v18i3.3291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v18i3.3291
Paulus Bambang Irawan. (2016). A Capability to Promote the Common Good. Jurnal Teologi, 5 (1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24071/jt.v5i1.477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/jt.v5i1.477
Peter Mahmudz Marzuki. (2021). The Essence of Legal Research is to Resolve Legal Problems. Yuridika, 37 (1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i1.34597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i1.34597
Robert Post. (2017). Data Privacy and Dignitary Privacy: Google Spain, the Right to Be Forgotten, and the Construction of the Public Sphere. Duke Law Journal, 598, 1–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2953468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2953468
Sintong Arion Hutapea. (2021). Right to be Forgotten sebagai Bentuk Rehabilitas bagi Korban Pelanggaran Data Pribadi. Jurnal Jurisprudentia, 1 (1), 1–10. https://jurisprudentia.bunghatta.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudentia/article/view/3/2.
Sunaryo. (2022). Konsep Fairness John Rawls, Kritik dan Relevansinya. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(1), 1-22, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1911
Theresia Anita Christiani. (2016). Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Ther Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006
Warren & Brandeis. The Privet Right. https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/privacy/Privacy_brand_warr2.html, diakses pada tanggal 20 Maret 2025.
Wirfa Prasuci, Hambali Thalib, & Nur Fadhillah Mappaselleng. (2021). Efektivitas Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Penyebaran Berita Bohong Melalui Media Facebook. Journal of Lex Generalis, 2 (3), 1254–1266. https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlg/article/view/426/479.
Yulia Rasmetaeva. (2020). The Right to be Forgotten in the European Perspective. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 10 (1), 58-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0004
Copyright (c) 2025 Judex Laguens - Ikatan Hakim Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors confirm the transfer of all copyrights of the manuscripts to the Board Editors of Judex Laguens upon its acceptance for publication and that the Board Editors of Judex Laguens - Ikatan Hakim Indonesia have the right to publish, republish, transmit, and distribute them in the Judex Laguens journal or other media.
- Manuscripts published by Ikatan Hakim Indonesia are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Every submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a "Copyright Notice" and "Ethical Statement".
