Differentiated Case Management Integrated Artificial Intelligence in the Case Management System in Indonesian Courts
Downloads
The case management system in Indonesia still applies a one-size-fits-all approach, leading to disparities in case resolution times and inefficiencies in managing court workloads. This study aims to develop a Differentiated Case Management (DCM) model integrated with Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance the efficiency of case handling in Indonesia. The research employs a normative juridical approach with a comparative study of DCM and AI implementations in various jurisdictions, as well as an analysis of regulations and legal policies in Indonesia. The findings indicate that DCM enables the classification of cases based on complexity levels, evidence requirements, and urgency, allowing for a more proportional allocation of judicial resources. The integration of AI into DCM can automate the case categorization process through Natural Language Processing (NLP) analysis of legal documents and case metadata, thereby reducing administrative burdens and improving the accuracy of case resolution time predictions. The implementation of AI- DCM also facilitates real-time case monitoring through the court information system, which can identify potential delays and optimize trial scheduling. This study recommends the development of specific regulations regarding the use of AI in case management, as well as the gradual implementation of the AI-DCM system through pilot projects in several courts before nationwide adoption. With this approach, Indonesia’s judicial system is expected to achieve higher efficiency, reduce case backlogs, and enhance transparency and accountability.
Asep Nursobah. (2020). Diminati Pihak Berperkara, 186.987 Perkara Didaftarkan Melalui e-Court Sepanjang 2020. Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/registry-news/1713-diminati-pihak-berperkara-186-987-perkara-didaftarkan-melalui-e-court-sepanjang-2020, diakses tanggal 1 Februari 2025.
Askari Razak. (2023). Mewujudkan Pemilu Adil Dan Bermartabat: Suatu Tinjauan Sistem Hukum Lawrence M. Friedman Realizing Fair and Dignified Elections: A Legal System Review Lawrence M. Friedman. Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 12(2). 1–8, https://doi.org/10.34304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34304/jf.v12i2.185
Caroline Cooper. (1993). Differentiated Case Management’ (Washington: Bureu of Justice Assistance, June 1993). https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles/difm.pdf, diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2025.
David Levinson. Differentiated Case Management. Bureau of Justice Assistance (Washington, 1995), https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412950664.n135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412950664.n135
E Agus Suryadi & H Supardi. (2021). Mewujudkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Melalui Case Management System (Studi Di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Bogor). Jurnal Suara Hukum, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v3n1.p1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v3n1.p1-25
Ekinia Karolin Sebayang, Mahmud Mulyadi, & Mohammad Ekaputra. (2024). Potensi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Artificial Intelligence sebagai Produk Lembaga Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 3(4), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v3i4.311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v3i4.311
Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida Miami. (2018). Civil Justice Initiative Pilot Project, Elevent Judicial Circuit of Florida Miami. (Florida Miami).
Glair.ai. (2022). Use Case Atau Kasus Penggunaan Natural Language Processing. https://glair.ai/blog-posts-id/use-case-atau-kasus-penggunaan-natural-language-processing, diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2025.
Hans Fabricius SC. (1996). Access to Justice The Woolf Report, Consultus. https://www.gcbsa.co.za/law-journals/1996/november/1996-november-vol009-no2-pp108-115.pdf, diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2025.
Imron Rosyadi & Aisyah Kahar. (2023). Analysis of Legal Certainty Aspects in Indonesian Marriage Registration Rule. JHP: Jurnal Hukum & Peradilan, 12(3), 469-488. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.469-488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.469-488
James E. Mcmillan, David C. Steelman & John A. Goerd. (2020). Caseflow Management: The Heart of Court Management in the New Millinnium. (California: National Center for State Court).
John Goerdt, Cris Lowvardias, & Geoff Gallas. (1991). Reexamining the Pace of Litigation in 39 Urban Trial Courts. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/reexamining-pace-litigation-39-urban-trial-courts, diakses tanggal 3 Februari 2025.
Kementrian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Pemanfaatan Kecerdasan Buatan Dalam Pemerintahan. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kanwil-banten/baca-artikel/16228/Pemanfaatan-, diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2025.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi Dan Informatika Nomor 3 Tahun 2021 Tentang Kegiatam Usahaberbasis Risiko Sektor Pos, Telekomunikasi Dan Sistem Dan Transaksi Elektronik. (Jakarta: Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika).
Kementrian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2022). Peranan Artificial Intelligence Dalam Pendidikan. https://ppg.dikdasmen.go.id/news/peranan-kecerdasan-buatan-artificial-intelligence-dalam-pendidikan, diakses tanggal 3 Februari 2025.
Linda Ikawati, Sulaiman, & Muhammad Fahri Husein. (2024). Masa Depan Penegakan Hukum Indonesia: Sistem Peradilan Pidana Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan (AI). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum 1, 12–13.
Mahkamah Agung RI. (2019). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, https://ecourt.mahkamahagung.go.id/PERMA_01_2019.pdf, diakses tanggal 1 Februari 2025.
Mahkamah Agung RI. (2015). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2015 Tentang Organisasi Dan Tata Kerja Kepniteraan Dan Kekretariatan Peradilan. (Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung).
Mahkamah Agung RI. (2024). Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung 2024. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/publikasi/laporan-tahunan, diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2025.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2018). Untuk Kembangkan E-Court MA Studi Banding Ke Singapura. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/berita/3302/untuk-kembangkan-e-court-ma-studi-banding-ke-singapura, diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2025.
Mahkamah Agung RI. (2014). Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Penyelesaian Perkara Di Pengadilan Tingkat Pertama Dan Tingkat Banding Pada 4 (Empat) Lingkungan Peradilan. (Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung).
Mahkamah Agung RI. (2012). Surat Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor: 138/KMA/SK/IX/2009 tentang Jangka Waktu Penanganan Perkara Pada Mahkamah Angung Republik Indonesia. (Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung).
Patricia Lee Refo, Stephan Landsman, & David Biderman. (1993). American Bar Association Principles for Juries and Jury Trials American Jury Project. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/aba_principles_for_juries_and_jury_trials_2005.pdf, diakses tanggal 3 Februari 2025.
Rachmi Dwi Wiladatil Qodliyah El Syafi & Ineke Dwi Rahma Putri. (2024). Meneropong Korelasi Integritas, Kesejahteraan Dan Putusan Hakim: Studi Literasi Sejarah Islam untuk Hakim Indonesia. Judex Laguens, 2(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.187-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.187-202
Ridwan, Ismansyah, & Khairul Fahmi. (2014). Pengajuan Upaya Hukum Banding Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pemilu Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilu Di Kota Solok Tahun 2019. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(4). 1181–1201, https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i4.429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i4.429
Stanley Marcus, John G. Koeltl, and Frederick Motz. (2024). Manual for Complex Litigition, Fourth (Waxington: Federal Juducial Center).
Sulartopo, Siti Kholifah, Danang & Joseph Teguh Santoso. (2023). Transformasi Proyek Melalui Keajaiban Kecerdasan Buatan: Mengeksplorasi Potensi AI Dalam Project Management’, Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen (JUPIMAN), 2(2), 363–692. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55606/jupiman.v2i2.2477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/jupiman.v2i2.2477
Suparto. (2019). Perbandingan Model Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia Dengan Komisi Yudisial Perancis. UIR Law Review, 3(18), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(01).3414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(01).3414
Thomson Reuters. (2024). AI in the Judiciary: A Singapore Courts Perspective’, Reuters, Thomson. https://insight.thomsonreuters.com/sea/legal/posts/ai-in-the-judiciary-a-singapore-courts-perspective, diakses tanggal 2 Februari 2025.
Wonseok Hwang, Kyoungyeon Cho, & Dongjun Lee. (2022). A Multi-Task Benchmark for Korean Legal Language Understanding and Judgement Prediction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.05224.
Copyright (c) 2025 Judex Laguens - Ikatan Hakim Indonesia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors confirm the transfer of all copyrights of the manuscripts to the Board Editors of Judex Laguens upon its acceptance for publication and that the Board Editors of Judex Laguens - Ikatan Hakim Indonesia have the right to publish, republish, transmit, and distribute them in the Judex Laguens journal or other media.
- Manuscripts published by Ikatan Hakim Indonesia are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Every submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a "Copyright Notice" and "Ethical Statement".
