ASSESSING THE VALIDITY OF ELECTRONIC DECISIONS AS AN EVIDENCE IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS

The industrial era 4.0, which is marked by technological advances, makes internet access a necessity for almost every human activity. Likewise, trial activities are also experiencing rapid developments, including those related to electronic evidence. In practice, electronic evidence in state administrative trials experiences various obstacles that can make it difficult to assess the electronic evidence. This research aims to examine how to assess electronic decision letters as valid evidence in the State Administrative Court and the obstacles in assessing electronic decision letters as evidence in the State Administrative Court. This research is normative legal research with a descriptive analysis method using a case approach. The research results show that electronic decisions can be said to be valid evidence in the State Administrative Court if they use an electronic system that applies in Indonesia and can be guaranteed to be intact, accountable, accessible and displayable. The obstacles in assessing electronic decisions as evidence in the State Administrative Court are technical obstacles such as discrepancies between electronic decision letters and decision letters.